From: Virtual reality for assessing emergency medical competencies in junior doctors – a pilot study
Instrument | Description of the measure | Source | Scales and designations |
---|---|---|---|
Demographic data and characteristics | Participants’ information on age, gender, previous experience with digital 3D and VR applications | None | 4 Items, each as separate selection |
Self-assessment of EMC | Questionnaire for EMC as a tool designed to allow participants to evaluate their own competency levels | Created by the authors inspired by [18] | 16 items on a 5-point Likert Scale, participants rated their agreement ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree |
Assessment of EMC using the VR simulation | Completion of scenarios with performance outcomes automatically generated based on actions. | Embedded checklist with 9 (EVB and MI) or 10 items (COPD). The results were scored as an overall percentage. | |
CRA performance test using the PEF | Post-encounter form as a performance test aimed at scoring the CRA | [15] | 5 open-ended questions for participants: • summary statement (max. 1 point) • problem list (max. 3 points) • differential diagnosis (max. 3 points) • most likely diagnosis (max. 1 point) • supporting data (max. 2 points) The results were scored as an overall percentage. |